Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 764
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ARTICLE
Year : 2001  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 127-132

Controlled clinical study of the efficacy of loratadine in Nigerian patients with allergic rhinitis.


Ear, Nose and Throat Unit, Department of Surgery,Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
C C Nwawolo
Ear, Nose and Throat Unit, Department of Surgery,Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-Araba, Lagos
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

An observer blind clinical study was carried out among 64 Nigerian patients with allergic rhinitis to assess the efficacy and tolerance of loratadine a new generation H1 antihistamine. Patients were allotted randomly to receive treatment for 1 week with either loratadine + Vit. C (group A), chlorpheniramine + Vit. C (group B), or Vit. C alone (group C). Assessment was by subjective symptom scoring of three nasal symptoms namely; sneezing, rhinorrhoea and nasal blockage. Difference between pre treatment and post treatment mean symptom scores was used as degree of improvement for statistical analysis and this formed the primary efficacy parameter. Adverse effects namely; anticholinergic effects, gastrointestinal effects and drowsiness were assessed following treatment. The results showed that loratadine was significantly better than Vit. C. alone (P = 0.0002) and chlorpheniramine was also significantly better than Vit. C. alone (P = 0.039). However, loratadine was significantly better than chlorpheniramine P = 0.046. Drowsiness was noted in 19.2% of patients on loratadine compared with 57.1% of patients on chlorpheniramine. lt is concluded that though both loratadine and chlorpheniramine were effective in the relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis in Nigerian patients, loratadine was significantly more effective with minimal sedating effect.


[PDF Not available]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed293    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal