Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 284
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 203-207

Initial experience with Spinal Stabilisation with Pedicle Screws and Rods in Nigerians: Indications and outcome of surgery


Department of Neurological Surgery,Department of Surgery, UCH, Ibadan, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
A A Adeolu
Department of Neurological Surgery,Department of Surgery, UCH, Ibadan
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Aims and Objectives :To provide an initial experience in performing the procedure of the use of pedicle screws and rods for stabilisation of the spinal column in Nigerians with highlights on indications and outcome of surgery. Materials and Methods: The hospital records of all the patients who had the procedure were retrieved. Biodata, presentation, neuroimaging findings, surgical procedure and postoperative outcomewere extracted from records. Evidence of recurrent spinal instability, change in neurological status, wound infection and implant related complications postoperatively were used as outcome measures Results: Twenty seven procedures were performed in 26 patients [male: female was 1:1]. The age range was 26 to 77 years (mean=52.9, SD= 13.7). Seventeen (65.4%) patients had degenerative spinal disease, while 9 (34.6%) had trauma. Five patients (19.2%) had thoracic spinal lesions and these were secondary to trauma, while there were 21 (80.8%) patients with lumbar spinal lesions. The indications for surgery were spinal instability in trauma cases and/or anticipated instability for degenerative cases. Two spinal segments were fused during 11 (40.7%) procedures, 3 in 10 (37.4%), 4 in 4 (14.8%) and 5 segments in 2 (7.4%) procedures. Post operatively, the Frankel grading improved in 6 (23.1%) patients, while it remained the same in 20 (76.9%). Back pain resolved in all but 1 (96.2%) patient. One (3.9%) patient each had screw fracture, recurrent instability andsymptomatic redundant rod lengthwhile 2 (7.7%) peri-operative mortalities occurred due to cardiac events. Conclusion: The most common indication for posterior spinal stabilisation with pedicle screws and rods in this study is established or anticipated instability from degenerative lumbar spinal disease.Immediate stabilisation was achieved in majority of the patients without postoperative neurological deterioration.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed591    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded63    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal