Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1344
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 25-30

Comparison of visual estimation of intra-operative blood loss with haemoglobin estimation in patients undergoing caesarean section


Department of Anaesthesia, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
Fidelis Anayo Onyekwulu
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku Ozalla, Enugu
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_164_18

Rights and Permissions

Background: Obstetrical haemorrhage is a potentially preventable cause of maternal morbidity and mortality; and measurements of surgical blood loss (BL) are often inaccurate. Accurate BL estimation is paramount as it may substantially alter the timing of interventions to control haemorrhage. The study compares the assessment of intra-operative BL by visual estimation with BL calculated from haemoglobin estimation using the HemoCue®201+. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 pregnant patients at term undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were enrolled into the study. In the theatre, the patients' haemoglobin level was determined before and after the surgery using the HemoCue®201+; and a modified Gross formula was used to calculate the BL. BL was also visually estimated and documented by counting the blood-soaked abdominal mops and gauze pieces and multiplying them by the estimated volume of blood each would hold; fixed size mops and gauzes were used. Statistical analysis was performed to compare both methods using SPSS Version 17. To compare BL assessment, Pearson's correlation and the Bland and Altman's method of assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement were used. Results: The mean visually estimated BL (EBL) and HemoCue calculated BL (CBL) were 470 ± 221 ml and 563 ± 204 ml, respectively (P = 0.125). The bias (mean difference between both methods) was negligible (45.25 ml), and the limit of agreement between both methods was −222.20–275.43 ml. The discrepancy between the two methods increased when BL was ≥500 ml. Conclusion: This study showed that visually EBL was closely related to HemoCue CBL when the quantity of BL was <500 ml.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1018    
    Printed47    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded120    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal