Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 171--176

Comparison of clinical efficacy of long- versus short-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists for pituitary down regulation in In vitro fertilisation cycles


Maureen Uche Umemmuo1, Efena Russ Efetie1, Chris Ovoroyeguono Agboghoroma1, Jafaru Alunua Momoh2, Joseph Ifeanyichukwu Ikechebelu3 
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria
2 Department of Chemical Pathology, National Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Maureen Uche Umemmuo
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Hospital Abuja, Abuja
Nigeria

Background: Gonadotrophin-Releasing Hormone agonist (GnRHa) – long and short acting – is used for pituitary down regulation prior to ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. However, there are controversies in the literature as to their effectiveness, dose of gonadotrophin needed subsequently for ovarian stimulation and the clinical outcome. Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of single-dose long-acting GnRHa – goserelin – and daily dose short-acting GnRHa – buserelin – for pituitary down regulation and their clinical outcome in IVF treatment. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was undertaken at the IVF centre in National Hospital Abuja, a public tertiary hospital in Nigeria. A total of 114 IVF patients were consecutively allocated into either long-acting GnRHa – goserelin – 3.6 mg single dose (Group A) or short-acting GnRHa – buserelin – 0.5 mg daily (Group B) both starting on day 21 of the cycle preceding the IVF treatment. The effects on pituitary down regulation and treatment outcomes were compared. Results: Time taken (days) to achieve down regulation (22.6 ± 4.3 vs. 26.1 ± 8.0; P = 0.084) and the mean number of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) doses used (57.7 ± 13.7 vs. 54.2 ± 16.7; P = 0.222) were similar in the two groups. Although the number of oocytes retrieved (9.9 ± 6.7 vs. 7.2 ± 5.0; P = 0.02) and fertilised (6.2 ± 4.4 vs. 4.6 ± 3.5; P = 0.04) were significantly higher in Group A, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of embryos (4.4 ± 2.6 vs. 4.0 ± 3.0; P = 0.850) and clinical pregnancy rate at 6 weeks (49.2% vs. 43.6%; odds ratio 1.249; confidence interval = 0.579–2.612; P = 0.578) in both the groups. While group B had a significantly higher number of hospital visits (P = 0.0001) as well as a higher number of injections (P = 0.0001), the mean cost of GnRHa and gonadotrophin used was significantly higher in Group A (P = 0.043). Conclusion: Single-dose long-acting GnRHa is as effective as daily dose short-acting GnRHa for pituitary desensitisation prior to controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles.


How to cite this article:
Umemmuo MU, Efetie ER, Agboghoroma CO, Momoh JA, Ikechebelu JI. Comparison of clinical efficacy of long- versus short-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists for pituitary down regulation in In vitro fertilisation cycles.Niger Postgrad Med J 2020;27:171-176


How to cite this URL:
Umemmuo MU, Efetie ER, Agboghoroma CO, Momoh JA, Ikechebelu JI. Comparison of clinical efficacy of long- versus short-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists for pituitary down regulation in In vitro fertilisation cycles. Niger Postgrad Med J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 4 ];27:171-176
Available from: http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2020;volume=27;issue=3;spage=171;epage=176;aulast=Umemmuo;type=0